Hi people!!
Today I’m going to present you a
different class compared to the active learning we’ve been seeing these days.
It seems such a contradiction, though, but session 3 of
the course I’m writing for, followed the traditional system of teaching:
lecturer talks in one direction and students listen to her. However, it appears as necessary as well, in small pieces, though, in order to present the content, but always followed by a practical task or activity to ensure that students have
understood it by practising it.
In this session, our lecturer
presented us different theoretical notions related to the teaching-learning
process. First of all, she explained a basic difference between: approach,
methodology and strategy. A teaching approach is the direction that an
instruction follows, so it comprises the whole teaching process. Within the
approach all the principles and methods used for instruction are included, so
different methodologies can be used within an approach depending on the task or
activity the teacher wants to perform. For example Cooperative and
Collaborative learning are two methodologies that can be used within the
Communicative approach. The last concept, strategy, refers to the different
tools or techniques that can be used to perform a methodology, so, for example,
we can present a cooperative task in which students have to fulfill the
activities with the use of ITC or a discussion.
This explanation was very
useful for me, since I’ve been taught different approaches, methodologies and
strategies during all the year, but it wasn’t till this moment that this
difference came clearly defined to me.

However, we also commented that the
best option to teach a language is to integrate both methodologies, that is,
traditional and active teaching, given that with the traditional you can
strengthen the basis in order to assure it with more active ways to practise
it.
Traditional Teaching |
Active Teaching |
We specially talked about the use of
word clouds in the teaching-learning process. We mentioned different ways to
use them into the different parts of the teaching, namely, pre-teaching, actual
teaching and post-teaching. I have referred to this teaching strategy in the
previous post as we used it in the station 3 of the active activity we
completed in class, so I can just stress again its usefulness because of two
things, its simplicity and its originality.
In the end, we made a distinction between Simulation and Role-play. They both are strategies used in
active teaching and they could be confused at a certain extent because both of
them imply the performance of a role, but we find the difference in the ending
of the task. In a role-play, the participants have to ‘act’ and play a defined
role, so the ending is already known by the ‘actor’, but in a simulation the
participants do not ‘act’, they discuss and negotiate as themselves, so the
conditions and decisions are impossible to know, there’s an open-ending.
In my opinion, the use of both strategies can be positive since to act out some role can make students understand and put themselves in other people's shoes, but with a simulation is the student who expresses his/her own feelings, so there is a personal development.
In my opinion, the use of both strategies can be positive since to act out some role can make students understand and put themselves in other people's shoes, but with a simulation is the student who expresses his/her own feelings, so there is a personal development.
As I said before, it is certain that
this session had a more theoretical nature, but it was very valuable from my
point of view in order to set the basis and be able to go to the next step by practising the theory with
active tasks that will make our students to understand the content better.
See you soon!!!